Why do they speak of a terrorist attack and yet call him a militant. The definitions are different. Militant suggests that he might be justified in his attacks. This moral ambiguity is very troubling and it is part of the problem we have in fighting the war on terror.
“WASHINGTON (AFP) Iraq’s most wanted militant, Jordanian Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, who as Al-Qaeda’s pointman in Iraq has claimed responsibility for dozens of attacks, is overseeing preparations for a major attack in Europe.
Citing European intelligence reports, Time magazine said Zarqawi “has been overseeing preparations by highly trained operatives for a large scale terrorist attack in Europe.”
Time did not specify the origins of the intelligence reports, but said Zarqawi has spoken of sleeper cells in Turkey and Iran “in communications with another Al-Qaeda leader.”
The reports imply that these cells may be in contact with European jihadist groups that previously had no links to Al-Qaeda, Time said.
“The fear is we’ll see these disparate, relatively inexperienced groups around Europe hook up with Afghan-trained terror cells, all under the influence of Zarqawi,” independent French terrorism expert Roland Jacquard told Time.
European officials say the reports are based in part on US officials’ interrogation of suspected Al-Qaeda deputy Abu Faraj al-Libbi, captured last May in Pakistan.”
Leave a Reply