Top Russian Official: Plane Terror Likely

Top Russian Official: Plane Terror Likely

By MARIA DANILOVA, Associated Press Writer

MOSCOW – A top Russian official acknowledged on Thursday what many citizens already suspected — that terrorism was the most likely cause of two jetliners crashing minutes apart, a feeling reflected in a newspaper headline warning that “Russia now has a Sept. 11.”

Just a day after officials stressed there were many possibilities besides terrorism, presidential envoy Vladimir Yakovlev told Russia’s ITAR-Tass news agency that the main theory “all the same remains terrorism.”

He said the planes’ flight recorders had not provided any clues to the disaster.

Additionally, Transport Minister Igor Levitin confirmed Sibir airlines’ report that its crew activated an emergency signal shortly before the plane disappeared from radar screens. Visiting the site of the crash, he said, however, that details were slim because “no verbal confirmation from the crew was received” saying what the problem was.

Officials previously said there was no indication of trouble from a Volga-Aviaexpress airliner that also crashed late Tuesday, although people on the ground reported hearing a series of explosions.

Russian media also raised questions about a possible link between the crashes and an explosion a few hours earlier at a bus stop on a road leading to Domodedovo airport, where the two doomed planes took off. Without citing any evidence, the reports suggested the blast, which wounded four people, might have been an effort to distract attention.

The suspicion of terrorism came after earlier warnings from officials that separatists might try to carry out attacks before an election this Sunday in Chechnya (newsweb sites) to replace the war-torn region’s assassinated pro-Kremlin president. The rebels have made attacks in Moscow and other cities, hijacked planes outside Russia and allegedly staged suicide bombings.

“I am inclined to think that it is a terrorist act, because there are too many coincidences,” said Ruben Suryaninov, an elderly retiree. “What needs to happen so that two planes going from the same airport would bang at the same moment?”

“It’s too suspicious,” agreed Natalia Kozhelupova, a physicist who was out on a national day of mourning for the 89 people killed in the crashes. Russia’s tricolor flag flew at half-staff and television canceled entertainment programs.

Despite Yakovlev’s statement about terrorism, officially the government’s investigation was still looking at all possibilities, including bombs, hijackers, mechanical failure, bad fuel and human error. Officials said no evidence had been found pointing to terrorism.

The government had hoped the jetliners’ flight data recorders would shed some light, but Yakovlev told state-run First Channel that experts found both boxes shut off before indicating any problems.

Yakovlev, the president’s envoy for southern Russia, where one of the planes crashed, said both boxes “turned off immediately” — an indication “that something happened very fast.”

The planes — a Sibir Tu-154 with 46 aboard and a Volga-Aviaexpress Tu-134 with 43 people — disappeared from radar almost simultaneously around 11 p.m. Tuesday. The Tu-134 was headed to the southern city of Volgograd and the other plane to the Black Sea resort city of Sochi, where President Vladimir Putin (newsweb sites) had been vacationing. They had taken off about 40 minutes apart.

A government commission appointed to investigate the crashes traveled Thursday to the site where the Tu-134 crashed about 120 miles south of Moscow. Emergency crews had already completed their work there, but other workers continued to check wreckage of the Tu-154 a few hundred miles south.

“There is still no clear-cut concept of what occurred, because the procedure of deciphering the data recorders will be conducted more than once,” Levitin, the transport minister and head of the commission, was quoted as saying by ITAR-Tass.

Oleg Panteleyev, an independent aviation expert in Russia, said that just because no clear evidence of terrorism had been found didn’t mean it that wasn’t the cause.

Any other explanation “seems to be purely impossible,” he told The Associated Press. “But then again absolutely incredible things can happen in life.”

There also was doubt about whether Russians could count on their government to tell the truth.

“I never trust what the authorities are saying, but in this case, I don’t know — it could have been an accident or a terrorist act,” said Yevgeny Skepner, a 37-year-old computer programmer.

Many Russians have ingrained doubts about the government’s candor after the confused and contradictory reports on the sinking of the nuclear submarine Kursk (newsweb sites) in 2000 and the still-murky 2002 seizure of a Moscow theater by Chechen rebels.

Still, Pavel Felgenhauer, an independent military analyst who is often critical of the government, said the government would have nothing to gain in covering up a terror attack.

“For the companies, the aviation industry, society and Russia as a whole, it would be better … because otherwise it means that things are really bad here — we have bad planes that crash to the ground one after another,” he said. “The fact that it is not being called a terrorist act, means they have no such evidence … because hiding a terrorist act is impossible.”

Panteleyev disagreed. “To miss such a major terrorist act for the security services means to acknowledge their impotence,” he said.

I am betting on terrorism, this is just way too coincidental for it to be an accident.

(Visited 40 times, 1 visits today)


  1. Anonymous August 27, 2004 at 5:42 pm

    I’m ascertained the kursk deadly sank into the barentszee wasn’t due to to terrorism. It was a nuclear submarine which rusted walls collapsed due to water pressure and no escape route. this incident however gives an obvious demonstration how russia deals with enshrouding their mistakes in a cloak of lies.


  2. Jack's Shack August 27, 2004 at 4:45 pm

    The Kursk. There are still those who think that the sub was a victim of terro also.

  3. Anonymous August 27, 2004 at 4:32 pm

    That’s true, but the russians are also always too eager to conceal their own fuck-ups(eg.kursk debacle) i gues we’ll just have to wait and see, ’till someone credible claims responsibility for the crashes.


  4. Jack's Shack August 27, 2004 at 3:16 pm


    If it was only one plane I would have a much easier time accepting that it was some type of accident. Some coincidences are too coincidental for my taste.

  5. Anonymous August 27, 2004 at 1:21 pm

    It could be terrorism, but also explosive mixed fuel or worn out parts. If it are terrorists it might be chechyans on the extremist side of maschadov. But with ongoing russian ‘operations’ in abchazie and ingoesjetia they might be from there as well.


Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

You may also like