Gaza

A while back I read a Daniel Pipes column in which he discussed Sharon’s plan for a unilateral disengagement from Gaza.

He maintained that it was a bad idea and that it would lead to further violence because he believes that it demonstrates to Hamas and company that terror does work. I have wrestled with whether I agree with him or not many times.

In large part because I want to believe in humanity. I want to believe that the “opposition” is composed of people who just want to live and love like us and that we can find common ground.

But then I read of so many incidents and so many comments that make me think that this is just not so. This selection is worth considering:

“Sami Abu Zuhri, the Hamas spokesman: “All the Israeli statements about a withdrawal from Gaza Strip are due to the Palestinian resistance operations. We are completely confident that as the Hezbollah Organization managed to kick the Israeli forces out of Lebanon, the Palestinian resistance will kick them out of the Palestinian territories, and we will continue our resistance.” (June 28, 2004)

Avi Yisacharov of Voice of Israel Radio, joint author (with Amos Harel of Ha’aretz) of a forthcoming book, The Seventh War, a study of the Oslo War that erupted in September 2000 based in large part on interviews with Hamas leaders, yesterday said on Israel’s Channel One Television that Hamas leaders tell him: “It was the Israeli left and your peace camp that ultimately encouraged us to continue with our suicide attacks.” He then paraphrased their viewpoint in more detail, ending up with the Gaza withdrawal:

We tried, through our attacks, to create fragmentation and dissention within Israeli society, and the left-wing’s reaction was proof that this was indeed the right approach. When we heard about the “Pilots’ Letter” [from 27 Israel Air Force pilots who refused to take part in bombing missions against Palestinian terrorists], and the elite soldiers who refused to serve [in the West Bank and Gaza], it strengthened those in our camp who promoted the idea of suicide bombers…. The disengagement from Gaza is proof of our victory. The fact is that Sharon is willing to withdraw unconditionally, and is essentially raising a white flag and retreating. Only by force can we teach the other side what to do.

When I read this and similar comments I admit to being disappointed and somewhat disheartened. It is disappointing because you hope that there are moderates who rise to positions of leadership and then you see language like this and you realize that it is not good.

This leads to the disheartening realization that the killing will continue. Innocent blood will be shed on both sides and families will dawn mourning clothes. It doesn’t speak well for people.

And I am saddened because I know that if you ask me what I think I will tell you that force is going to be required. It is not the long term answer, but it is part of what will force the return of diplomacy. It may not be my son or daughter, but many of my cousins are going to be placed in harms way, so I am not completely untouched. Let alone the simple realization that I am sitting at a computer and typing about the death of people in such a cavalier fashion.

(September 10, 2004″)

(Visited 36 times, 1 visits today)

2 Comments

  1. Jack's Shack September 12, 2004 at 4:45 pm

    That is the whole point, they intentionally tried to create dissension and when they saw the reaction of the left they understood this to mean that they were successful.

    Can you see how perverse this is. They continue to recruit human bombs to murder innocent people. They cultivate a culture of death that makes it ok to slaughter people without regard for anything.

    You may not see the shades of grey, but find it difficult to accept a comparison of equality between the bomber who blows himself up in a schoolyard and the pilot who kills people we call “collateral damage.”

    It is tragic and terrible that this happens, but here is the distinction. One tries to cause as much bloodshed as possible and the other tries to minimize it.

  2. Anonymous September 12, 2004 at 8:57 am

    This message is a distortion of reality. Hamas officials can say it was the israeli left who succumbed to the pressure of suicide attacks and therefore clearing the path to disengage from gaza, when you think rationaly the conclusion remains that this is somewhat illogic.

    The right-wing likud of sharon is in charge, why would he bow to the will of the leftist opposition? He won’t. The only reason hamas sends this message into the world is in an attempt to fragment the israeli society. Through manipulation they try to extrapolate political differences to a life and death cause. Sharon even contemplates to form a coalition with the shas party, he really won’t let the ‘scared’ left convince him from disengaging from gaza.

    Hamas employs a tactic widely used among dictators all over the world: divide and conquer.

    On the subject of the israeli fighter-pilots refusing to participate in missions, i find it a demonstration of great character. I have seen a documentary about an israeli pediatritian who is also a pilot, he says he won’t take out convoys who drive in the middle of urban traffic and he won’t bomb entire apartments because there is a purported terrorist inside. Instead of desertion, i find it a showcase of high moral integrity.

    Zeruel

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  
Please enter an e-mail address

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

You may also like