• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to footer

The JackB

"When you're in jail, a good friend will be trying to bail you out. A best friend will be in the cell next to you saying, 'Damn, that was fun'." Groucho Marx

  • About Jack
    • Other Places You Can Find Me
  • Contact Me
    • Disclosure
  • About Jack
    • Other Places You Can Find Me
  • Contact Me
    • Disclosure

Archives for May 2005

The Exodus from Gaza

May 15, 2005 by Jack Steiner Leave a Comment

I am a regular reader of Daniel Gordis, in part because I know him and in part because I find his writing to be compelling. If you ask him he might not recognize my name, but my face for certain, not that any of this matters. What I appreciate is that he looks at life in Israel from a very real perspective, placing a human face on all sides. And based upon past discussions and much of what I have read I think that our politics are similar. He has undergone an interesting evolution and I suspect I might have too if I had actually made aliyah. In his most recent dispatch he writes about a recent experience with his family and the upcoming disengagement. It is a long, but well written piece that I am going to grab a few nuggets from.


This year, we decided that with the Disengagement coming up, probably sometime at the end of the summer, we should take the kids to Gush Katif in Gaza so that they could see what it is that we’re actually leaving. I, at least, didn’t want their impressions of these people and their communities to be based solely on the press, or rumors, or imagination.
In favor or against (and the kids are actually split), I wanted them to see real people, real houses, gardens, synagogues, cemeteries. And the Palestinians who live around them. In other words, the whole complicated mess.”


Not to spend a ton of time lauding Gordis, but I really do appreciate his ability to make it human. In the next section he tells of taking the wrong road and illustrates a story that sounds like it should have been part of a movie.


So we set out early Tuesday morning of Pesach to make our way to Gaza.Given the traffic jams that normally accompany every Pesach day-trip, we left relatively early in the morning, and decided to take the back way out of Jerusalem, which means going south, by Gilo, Beit Jala (of Intifada fame) and the “tunnel road” to Gush Eztion. From there, we’d head south-west and wind our way over to Gaza, I figured.

We went past Gush Eztion, via the tunnel road that was the object of all the shooters from Beit Jala a few years ago and that is now shielded by massive concrete barriers on either side. As I looked at the map while driving, it seemed to me that a bit further south there was a road that offered a more direct cut, due west, and that might save us a bit of time. Why not, I figured? So we kept heading south, when all of a sudden, any semblance of being in Israel disappeared. The signs were all in Arabic. There was very little traffic on the road, and what there was, was all Palestinian taxis and trucks (with different license plates, of course, making our car stand out rather starkly). There were kids shepherding their flocks of sheep and goats on either side of the road, and older men in kafiyehs, sitting by the side of the road, or walking. More than anything else, though, people were staring at us, with a look that more or less said, “What in the world are YOU doing HERE?”

I was hoping that the kids would stay in their earphone-induced trances in the back, and that Elisheva would continue to doze, until I’d made the right turn and gotten us out of there, but no such luck. A few minutes later, the kids began to ask, “Where, exactly, are we?”

“South of Gush Eztion,” I said, as if that would be comforting.

The kids went back to their music, at which point Elisheva whispered to me, “I don’t think this road was such a great idea. You notice we’re the only Israelis near here? And there’s not even any army in evidence?”

“You don’t have to whisper,” I pointed out. The kids were behind solid walls of mp3, and as for the danger outside, well, whispering wasn’t going to help. I found myself trying to remember how long it had been since we’d switched the tires on the car, wondering how long, exactly, we might stay alive on this road if we had to stop to change one. I decided not to share that thought with her.

“How much longer till we hit the green line [and enter Israel proper again],” I asked her, pointing to the map that she was holding.

She looked at the map. “A while.”

“Meaning?”

“Meaning I don’t know. The green line’s not on the map.”

Oh, yeah. That oft-forgotten little fact about Israeli maps. Hardly any of them show where the line used to be. As if, until recently, there was no sense that it would ever be important again.

“Well, how long till we’re out of these Palestinian villages and back near something with a Hebrew name?”

“A while.”

“Meaning?”

“Meaning, I don’t know. A while.” Still in a whisper, as if whispering would mean that they couldn’t see us. I took the map and gave it a look. She was right. A while. What looks like nothing on an international map can actually take a long time when you’d like to be anywhere but there. I picked up our speed, to about 125 or 130 km/h, which usually prompts a gentle “you’re driving a bit fast, no?” But this time, no objections from the co-pilot. An unspoken assent,basically, “Just get us out of here.”

So we flew along in what will, after another Exodus one day, be Palestine, and eventually, hit an army roadblock. It was designed mostly to stop Palestinians from entering Israel proper from our direction. There was a line at the roadblock, as the soldiers made everyone in the cars in front of us (they were all Palestinians, in Israeli taxis) get out, searched their bags, the trunks, etc. When one of the soldiers saw us in the line, he flagged us over to the left side, and into the lane for ongoing traffic. I lowered the window to answer his questions, but he didn’t have any. He just gave us a look of complete bewilderment at seeing a car with people like us in a place like that, and waved us on.

“Where are we now?” came the question from the back.

“Safe,” I wanted to say, but didn’t.


Sounds crazy, no.

“Was that Gush Katif?” Micha wanted to know.

“No, that was Gush Eztion before.”

“What’s the difference?” as if “Gush” was all that matters.

So,at the next gas station, we pulled over. Everyone out of the car. I took out two maps that together, covered most of the country, laid them
on the ground and showed them Gush Eztion, Gush Katif, and our route.

“Where did we just go through?” one of the older kids wanted to know.

“Some Palestinian areas,” I said, nonchalantly, and pointed to our route.

“That was pretty dumb, Abba,” one of them said. To which Micha said, “Is the part we just went through going back, too?”

“Next time,” one of the older kids said.”

“What next time?” he wanted to know.

The sibling explanation continued: “Now we’re giving up Gaza. But it won’t be the last time we have to give back land. The part we just went
through will be the next thing that gets put on the chopping block.

They want all of this for their State.”

I decided to let them talk it out, and said nothing. But their wheels were churning; that much was clear.

Forty-five minutes later, we drove though Sederot, where the Kassam rockets have
been landing of late, and a few minutes after that, crossed the Kissufim junction, and made our way into Gaza, which suddenly, in relative terms, now seemed rather safe. It was also pretty empty.

The enormous protest march wasn’t scheduled until the next day, and we’d decided to come the day earlier to avoid the masses.

Now the kids had dispensed with the mp3 players, and were looking out the windows, taking some pictures. Of the tanks on the side of the road. Of the horrendous and enormous Palestinian refugee camps, just a few hundred yards from the Jewish communities that were already visible.

Of the sign at the side of the road that said “Kfar Darom will not fall again,” a play on the famous “Massada will not fall again” phrase. Or
of the sign that said “careful – tank crossing,” or the one that read “We love you, Land of Israel.” Not the roadside literature of the neighborhood my kids live in.

We drove around Gush Katif, the biggest block of Jewish communities in Gaza, for a while. We went first to Neve Dekalim, a large-ish community, with streets, and houses, and parks, and a little downtown with a shopping center. And a synagogue. And a cemetery just outside.
It looked, as the kids quickly saw, not like a “settlement,” but like a city. Which it basically is.”

Some people will read this and feel nothing, others may see this and get a lump in their throats, but it is hard for me not to just shake my head because of the incredible complexities involved. How do you just ignore the sacrifices that these people are asked to make and not feel for the Palestinians. Yet, every time I read about another bombing or attack it becomes harder to remember that the other side has a human face.


“Which part of this is going back?” Micha wanted to know.

“Everything you can see,” his sister told him.

“What, ALL of this?”

“Yup. All of it.”

“And they get to keep all the buildings?”

“Yup.”

“And they get to live in the houses?”

“Yup.”

“What are they going to do with a shul?” Micha wanted to know.

“Loot it and deface it,” one sibling replied.

“You don’t know that,” I interjected, trying to make this conversation a
bit less wrist-slashingly depressing.

“Yes,
we do,” came the response. “Abba, you know what happened to the shul in
Yamit after we gave it back to the Egyptians, don’t you?” I do, so I figured I’d let that one slide.

It was now very quiet in the car. All of a sudden, the “disengagement” was more than a political hot potato. Or the reason for some signs or an argument on the evening
news. Now, it was about people, whom the kids could see on the sidewalks, walking with their families, pushing their strollers. Not wild eyed maniacs walking around with M-16s, just people, real people, who look exactly like we do. Now, the disengagement was about giving up well tended gardens. Playgrounds. Homes. It’s one thing, we were all seeing, to be “in favor.” It’s quite another to see the horrendous price a lot of people — many of them Israel’s most passionate pioneers
— are going to have to pay.

“What do we get when we give all this back?” Micha wanted to know.

“Nothing,” came the icy response.

“Well, do they have to pay for the houses?”

“No.”

“Do they have to do anything?”

“They don’t even have to make peace. They just get it.”

“Then I don’t get it.”

I was tempted to explain Sharon’s security reasons for getting out, or the high price, in life and in money, that the army pays to hold on to it, or the eventual Apartheid with which we’ll be faced if we don’t stop ruling what will soon be an Arab majority between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean sea, but I didn’t say anything. None of that,after all, would address what he was really saying. That the cost seems enormous. That the pain feels overwhelming. That the risk is huge. And he’s right.

I continued driving around, when Elisheva said,
“Let’s get out of here. I’m way beyond depressed.” But Talia, who’d been there recently and who knew her way around better than we did, said we should go to another community, Shirat HaYam, which was just a few minutes away.

Five minutes later, having driven a short road
with refugee camps on one side, we came upon a giant fence, with a soldier guarding it. “Is this Shirat HaYam?” I asked him. He nodded, and opened the gate. We drove in, and followed the solitary, single lane road through the …. the what?

Not a city. Not even a community.
About ten little caravans on the most beautiful middle-eastern beach I’ve ever seen, and some abandoned Egyptian buildings that were now being renovated, even as we watched, presumably for the influx of people moving there before the disengagement. Through the car windows, and through the aforementioned high fence, our kids watched the Palestinian kids walking by. One strip of sand, one fence, two utterly separated populations.

We spent some time there, and then went
on to other communities, but left pretty quickly. Later in the day, after a few hours on the Ashkelon beach to try to recuperate, we
decided to head back to Jerusalem.

“Traffic’s going to be murder,” Elisheva said.

“Well, we can take the same route we took to get here,” I suggested, but the look was “That’s not even funny.”

“How about 443?” I asked, referring to the Modi’in Road, that goes by Ramallah and enters Jerusalem from the north. That road was also
impassable in the days of the Intifada (or at least made you a target for the daily shootings there), but it, too, is protected by concrete barriers now so sharpshooters can’t aim as easily at the cars. And besides, we have peace now, right?

“Good idea. That’ll probably be more open.”

So we took Highway 6, Israel’s new road, our equivalent of an interstate, EZ-Pass and all, and got off the exit to the 443. After a little bit of
driving, Micha perked up, again, and said, “What’s this road?”

We told him.

“This is ours, right?”

“Right.”

“This we get to keep?”

Again, the sibling chorus. “For now. This will go back when we give back the road we were on this morning.”

“Abba, is that true?” he asked, incredulous that everywhere we seemed to go was destined to be given back.

“Basically.”

“Well, what IS going to be left?”

Not much to say to that. Luckily, he needed to change the batteries on his music player, and the conversation ended.

But his question lingered in my mind, long after the day was over. What do you say to the kid when he says “There won’t be much left, will there?” How do you explain that most people in the country are willing (with varying degrees of ambivalence) to give that all back, in the hope that something better can emerge here. Or because we’d rather face uncertainty with the Palestinians than the certainty of Apartheid. Or because we’ve all got kids in the army now, and the cost, many of us think, is just too high. For a twelve year old kid, who’s lived most of
the years he can actually remember in an Intifada, none of that would be terribly convincing, so I didn’t even try. Or could it have been because after a day of actually being there, the pain that these people
will experience was so palpable that no words seemed adequate?”

Filed Under: Israel

An Effective Response To Terror

May 13, 2005 by Jack Steiner Leave a Comment

J.J. and I have been going back and forth on a post she wrote about Bush’s trip to the Netherlands.

It is a conversation that has been held by millions of other people at many different points in time, myself included.

I don’t have time to provide a very lengthy post about this but I want to comment on it. Essentially the conversation is about the most effective method of defeating terrorists and in particular whether the U.S. is currently aiding in the recruitment of new terrorists or serving as a deterrent.

When I have a moment I want to come back and review some articles that I had posted last year. In the interim you might find these two to be quite interesting. Here are selections from both pieces.

I hope to dig into them in detail a little bit later.

Bernard Lewis discusses the past, present, and future of the Middle East

Considered by many the world’s foremost living historian of the Middle East, Bernard Lewis, the Cleveland E. Dodge Professor of Near Eastern Studies, Emeritus, has studied the Muslim world for more than half a century. His work spans the medieval to the modern periods and encompasses multiple aspects of Islamic lands, from the Ottoman Empire to Islam’s relationship with the West. Cultured and refined, he has written with great respect about the Muslim world, which for centuries was the center of civilization. For years and in several books, he has examined Islam’s troubled attempts to encompass modernity. His latest book, What Went Wrong: Western Impact and Middle Eastern Response, looks at that region’s “downward spiral of hate and spite, rage and self-pity, poverty and oppression.”

He wrote the book before September 11, 2001.

The rage that fueled the attacks has been building for 300 years, says Lewis, a British-born, naturalized U.S. citizen who turned 86 last May. His phone was ringing off the hook last fall with requests for interviews, lectures, and private sessions with U.S. officials in the Pentagon and the White House.”


And


Bernard Lewis Unplugged

WHAT WAS THE BIG MISTAKE OF THE NEGOTIATORS AT CAMP DAVID?

They forgot that is not just a matter of negotiations between leaders, but between two differing civilizations. It is easy to slip and interpret your adversary according to your worldview. I will give you an example. I think that Israel was right to enter Lebanon, and I well remember how its army was received as an army of liberation, with flowers and music, but from the moment the job was completed, it was necessary to withdraw from there. The late withdrawal, as it was undertaken without agreement, with abandonment of friends and weaponry, was interpreted by the Palestinians and the other Arabs as a sign of weakness. From the experience of Hizbullah they derived that the Israelis are soft, pampered, and if they are hit — they will surrender. These things have been said explicitly by the Palestinians.

DO THE TWO CULTURES INTERPRET DIFFERENTLY THE CONCEPTS OF “FAIR COMPROMISE” AND “VIEWING REALITY OUT OF A CONSIDERATION FOR THE ENEMY’S POINT OF VIEW?

Let me be precise: Muslim culture stands out in the generosity of its victors. The victor does not push the face of the vanquished in the dust, but the result of the struggle has to be clear to both sides. A struggle that ends indecisively is an invitation for trouble. The Ottomans provided us with many examples of this conduct: they crushed rebels with a strong hand and an outstretched arm, but did not humiliate the defeated, they showed generosity toward them and even helped them rehabilitate themselves. If the one with the power does not exhaust his ability to bring about such a victory, his conduct is interpreted as cowardice.

Another example of differing interpretations of conduct is the is significance of manners and customs: I visited Jordan some time after the signing of the peace agreement on which the Jordanians bed much hope, and I found the Jordanians agitated over the conduct of the Israeli tourists which they saw as provocative and humiliating. It was difficult for me to explain to them that Israelis behave that way even to each other. The Israelis, who seem to be the least polite people in the world, are not understood by the Arabs, who have the most well-mannered culture in the world. It is not a matter of insignificant etiquette, but of conduct that has a bearing on relations between the peoples. The lack of courtesy of the Israeli solders at the checkpoints has terrible repercussions and something needs to be done about this matter.”

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Manchester United- We Will Fix The Sport

May 13, 2005 by Jack Steiner Leave a Comment

A recent article on CNN discussed the takeover of Manchester United by Malcom Glazer and the feelings of their fans:

Supporters’ groups, whose opposition helped prevent a 1999 takeover by satellite television company BSkyB, demonstrated on Thursday at Old Trafford, home of the most famous club in British football, to voice their anger.

Fans say Glazer has no knowledge of the football side of the club and is interested purely in its brand, rivalled only by Real Madrid, and revenues.

They fear his £790 million ($1.49 billion) offer will saddle United with heavy debts, forcing up ticket prices and diverting funds which could be used to improve the team which finished a disappointing third this season.

Their real fear lies in the knowledge that their team engages in a fake sport that is the beard hooligans use to misbehave.

At last we are going to see the beginning of the end of this silly sport. It is just a matter of time before we acquire other teams and disband them so that we can spread better and more interesting sports around the world.

Cue manaical laughter.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Trapped In The Stall- Embarrassing Moments

May 13, 2005 by Jack Steiner Leave a Comment

“Embarrassing Moments
Are Part And Parcel of Life. Sometimes you really do have to grin and bear it. Most of the time I am good at it, but sometimes I just miss the mark.”

Embarrassing Moments
Are Part And Parcel of Life. Sometimes you really do have to grin and bear it. Most of the time I am good at it, but sometimes I just miss the mark. For those of you who are squeamish or not interested in potty humor I suggest that you move along.

Yesterday something I ate chose to attack me in a most uncomfortable manner. I don’t know what it was, I have tried to identify the culprit so that I could bring him/her/it to justice or at least expel the offender from my domain, but thus far I have had little to no success.

As you have already begun to imagine a little gastric distress in the wrong place can be a bit problematic. It is the kind of thing that although people can relate to, it is not unusual for them to handle it as if they were a young child.

Yesterday’s initial attack caught me by surprise. The insurgents cleverly began their attack while I was in my office, but it was so minor that I dismissed it out of hand. Gradually the assault increased in its intensity, but it wasn’t until I was stuck in traffic that they launched their D-Day upon me.

My troops valiantly battled to find a clear path through traffic to a place of refuge where we could regroup and assess the situation. We managed to reach a local Office Depot and breathlessly ran through the store with the hounds of hell baying at our feet.

We were ever so happy to enter the restroom and find an unoccupied stall, an oasis which we could use to rest and relax. Little did we know that the insurgency was so jacked up they were willing to lay siege to my refuge for an extended period of time.

It was during this time that they changed tactics and tried to shame me. A man walked into the restroom and immediately upon entering began to cough and complain about the air quality. He was followed by a second man who agreed with his observation and instead of fleeing the area they sojourned (love that term) there for an extended period of time leaving me trapped within.

Of course I could have waltzed out while they dilly-dallyed within and on many other occasions I have, but not this time. This time I had expended so much energy fighting the insurgents that I was mentally worn and so I waited until they left before I was able to exit my temporary rabbit hole.

I was red faced and tired, but not humiliated. In the end I won, but the cost of the battle remains with me today, a dull ache serves to remind me of the difficult situation I faced.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

The Lord of the Rings/Star Wars Discussion Spinoff

May 12, 2005 by Jack Steiner Leave a Comment

I have been enjoying the conversation about whether Star Wars had a bigger impact than the LOTR. The initial post is here. But I want to thank Doctor Bean for bringing a new element into the discussion. He remarks here about an article that is very interesting.

It is called The ‘Ring’ and the remnants of the West and I thought that it was worth citing some of the more interesting elements.

The most important cultural event of the past decade is the ongoing release of the film version of J R R Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings. No better guide exists to the mood and morals of the United States. The rapturous response among popular audiences to the first two installments of the trilogy should alert us that something important is at work. Richard Wagner’s 19th-century tetralogy of music dramas, The Ring of the Nibelungs, gave resonance to National Socialism during the inter-war years of the last century. Tolkien does the same for Anglo-Saxon democracy.
Tolkien well may have written his epic as an “anti-Ring” to repair the damage that Wagner had inflicted upon Western culture.

Tolkien himself
despised Wagner (whom he knew thoroughly)
and rejected comparisons between his Ring and Wagner’s cycle
(“Both rings are round,” is the extent of his published comment).


Ok, so what we have here is the opening salvo in which the author presents the idea that Tolkien wrote his series based upon Wagner’s piece. This may not be news to some of you, but it is to me. It should be noted that the author mentions that Tolkien was familiar with Wagner.

It is hard for us today to imagine what a cult raised itself around Wagner after the 1876 premiere of his Ring cycle. Compared to it the combined fervor for Elvis, the Beatles, Madonna and Michael Jackson seems like a band concert in the park. Perfectly sensible people attended a Wagner opera and declared that their lives had changed. Bavaria’s eccentric King Ludwig II literally fell in love with the composer and built him the Bayreuth Festival, to which the elite of Europe repaired in homage. It was something like the mood that swept the youth of the West in the late 1960s, but an order of magnitude more powerful.

In 1848, Wagner was a disgruntled emulator of French grand opera who stockpiled hand grenades for revolutionaries, a fugitive from justice after that year’s uprising. A quarter-century later he stood at the pinnacle of European culture. What precisely did he do?

Wagner announced the death of the old order of aristocracy and Church, of order and rules. Not only was the old order dying, but also it deserved to die, the victim of its inherent flaws. As the old order died a New Man would replace the servile creatures of the old laws, and a New Art would become the New Man’s religion. The New Man would be fearless, sensual, unconstrained, and could make the world according to his will. Wagner’s dictum that the sources of Western civilization had failed was not only entirely correct, but also numbingly obvious to anyone who lived through the upheavals of 1848. But how should one respond to this? Wagner had a seductive answer: become your own god!

Using elements of
old Norse sagas and
medieval epic,
Wagner cobbled together a new myth.

So Wagner takes Norse mythology to carve out a new story about a new world and way of life and it just so happens that this myth utilizes a talisman that bestows great power upon the wielder of it. And not only that, but the talisman corrupts the wielder.

Corruption leads to violence which leads to chaos which eventually leads to a destruction of the talisman and a new world order.

It sounds quite similar and personally I do not have a problem with it. Kohellet said it, “there is nothing new under the sun” and that is not necessarily a problem. All ideas spring off of another idea.

The question is how you improve upon the original idea. I had planned on writing more about this but had way too much fun tweaking my blog. It probably looks kind of rough, but that is the challenge of teaching myself how to code.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Life In My Cave-The Fortress of Solitude

May 12, 2005 by Jack Steiner Leave a Comment

Coping Skills

Little nicks, scrapes and bruises are sometimes worse than the more devastating blows that life offers. But life is about coping skills, how you act and or react can make all the difference.

I am feeling a little beat up today. I think that this has been coming for a while now. A series of events have finally caught up to me.

Little nicks, scrapes and bruises are sometimes worse than the more devastating blows that life offers. But life is about coping skills, how you act and or react can make all the difference.

So I have been trying to remind myself of that. It is not always easy to maintain your perspective and sense of where things really are at when little irritants are constantly being flung at you.

One of the ways in which I sometimes handle these moments is to retreat into my cave, my own Fortress of Solitude. I head into it and just lose myself there so that I can find time to regroup and recharge my batteries.

The hardest part about it is the feeling that I am not giving enough to my loved ones, that my absence is taking from them when I should be giving more. But at the same time I have learned from experience that if I do not find some time for myself I will eventually blow up. If I can avoid going Mt. Vesuvius on them it is better for everyone.

One of the components of trying to gain a little perspective is to take a mental inventory of what is bothering me so that I can try and figure out if it is worth the time to work on it or if it is really something that is temporal in nature and will fade away.

Most of the time I really do find out that what bothers me is not real important nor likely to last long, so the real issue is that this is a collection of little things that by themselves have little to no ability to irk me, but collectively are a general pain-in-the-ass.

One of the best things about blogging is the ability to vent and say what I have to say so that I can release the little irritants and allow myself to recover faster than I would have had I just held it all in.

In the end I always come out smiling on the other side because I make that happen. Sometimes I forget that and sometimes I get lost, but one way or another I usually find my way.

Filed Under: Blogging

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 18
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

Things Someone Wrote

The Fabulous Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Jack Steiner

 

Loading Comments...