Better hide the tattoo

The LA Times covered a story that is related to the post on body piercing below.

Last year Justin Miloro had to wear long sleeves to conceal the Buddha curling around his left forearm and the yellow-orange sun rays on his right. Pants covered the depiction of Earth on one leg and wings on the other. The sun spreading across his back was under wraps. The plugs in his earlobes were obscured by bandages.

“I thought it was really silly,” Miloro recalled, “worse than seeing the tattoos.”

This year he has nothing to hide — even though the 32-year-old worked last year for Whole Foods Market Inc. in Boston, where he was a salesclerk, and now works as a manager for the same company in Los Angeles, overseeing health and beauty products departments at 25 stores.

The chain has looser dress and grooming standards in some parts of the country than others. Setting degrees of tattoo taboos is how Whole Foods handles the increasing attraction to — though definitely not universal acceptance of — body art.

Once associated with drunken sailors, felons and Hells Angels, tattoos have gone nearly mainstream, putting employers in a bind. How to write rules that won’t alienate un-hip customers on the one hand or eliminate talented workers on the other?

Different standards have emerged. A pink rose discreetly inked on an ankle might pass muster at a hospital but not a day-care center; an eyebrow stud will be viewed as charming at one store and a blemish at another.

In many cases, grooming policies are being set by members of a generation known for letting it all hang out.

“The baby boomers had hair out to the ceiling, cut jeans, ripped clothes that they washed sometimes,” said Mark Mehler, co-founder of CareerXroads, a New Jersey recruiting and consulting firm.

And now boomers are passing judgment on nose rings.

The irony isn’t lost on Fred Saunders, president and founder of FSPS Inc., which stages concerts and productions for companies including Nintendo Co. and Walt Disney Co. Some of them demand clean-cut crews: trimmed sideburns, long hair pulled into ponytails, no detectable tattoos.

Of course, Saunders, 57, doesn’t often take his shirt off during contract negotiations: On his back is a tattoo tableau featuring a samurai warrior skirmishing with a dragon.

“There’s a shock value to the art,” he acknowledged, and some people get a “negative vibe.”

Nearly 50% of Americans between 21 and 32 have at least one tattoo or a piercing other than in an ear, according to a 2006 study by the University of Chicago and Northwestern University. Men and women alike say their tattoos make them feel sexy and rebellious, a 2003 Harris Poll found, while the unadorned of both genders see body art as unsightly and think those with tattoos and piercings are less intelligent and less attractive.

I am not a big fan of tattoos or alternative body modification. I understand why some people might want to engage in some of this behavior. I once found myself in a tattoo chair but at the last minute pulled out. I opted out for two reasons, one religious and the other was a concern about how I might feel in 20 years. Would I still think that it was cool.

I know that as a business owner I would prefer to have non-modified employees interacting with the public, but that is based upon practical reasons. I’d rather err on the side of safety. Then again if I had a different sort of business I might feel otherwise.

In regard to my children, I’d prefer that they not get a tattoo, let alone any sort of outrageous body modification. Again that is based upon experience. You just don’t know what the future holds and I’d prefer that they have more options than fewer.

(Visited 36 times, 1 visits today)


  1. Jack's Shack July 9, 2007 at 2:54 am

    ‘Mom, why does grandma have a tattoo of a dagger on her butt?'”

    It is a legitimate concern. I have seen what happens to tattoos after 25 or more years and they just look worse.



    Yes, some people have negative reactions to those with tattoos, but that is a prejudice that I can’t get behind.


    It most definitely is a prejudice, but it is not one that particularly bothers me. I’ll be the first to say that tattoos do not always offer an indication of what a person may be like.

    However as a businessman there are some images that I can and want to avoid. It is not prudent to scare away potential customers.

    Prior to becoming a parent I might have felt differently but the reality is that I have responsibilities and I can’t take that kind of chance.

    As I said before, I can very close to getting my own tattoo but I am quite happy I didn’t.

    It is a solid 20 years ago that I sat in that chair. I am unquestionably different than I was then so I can’t say that I am upset that I didn’t do it.

    except that most people have put more thought into their tattoos.

    Don’t know if I buy that line. Seen too many things that suggest otherwise.

  2. annie July 9, 2007 at 1:44 am

    I have to disagree with you on this one. As a member of the younger generation, many of my friends have tattoos. Mostly they are small and easily concealable, but some are not. It is a form of self-expression not unlike the way you dress.

    Yes, some people have negative reactions to those with tattoos, but that is a prejudice that I can’t get behind. It is the same as judging people by the way they dress (also a clear personal choice), except that most people have put more thought into their tattoos.

  3. Mark July 9, 2007 at 12:50 am

    ‘Mom, why does grandma have a tattoo of a dagger on her butt?’

    Because she’s the meanest grandma in the valley of the shadow of death and she fears no evil…


  4. Kol Ra'ash Gadol July 8, 2007 at 10:39 pm

    Hari color is no big deal – you can always cut it, regrow it, wear a wig, whatever; piercings are mostly, I agree, okay – multiple ear (I have six myself) modest nose, even belly button, although I personally feel very squeamish about that – (I ought to say, tongue is unsanitary, and bad for one’s teeth) but tattoos and alot of the body mod – yep, unsightly.
    I’ll admit before I became observant, I used to think occasionally about getting some small wicked little tat somewhere discreet, like the sall of my back or ankle or thigh, but now that I’m a little older, I keep noticing these middle aged people with tattoos that I’m sure they once thought were wicked little tattoos, and gues what – they look ridiculous. As my mom said then,” yeah, it looks cute and dangerous now, but what are you gong to say to your grandchildren when they ask their mother, ‘Mom, why does grandma have a tattoo of a dagger on her butt?'”

    Glad I missed the opportunity to look stupider than I would naturally.

  5. Jack's Shack July 8, 2007 at 6:28 pm


    Some people haven’t the foggiest idea where to draw the line.


    Hair color is a different story altogether.

  6. MizEllie July 8, 2007 at 2:55 pm

    I myself am not a fan of tatoos, as I like to be able to change my appearance. Ever-changing hair color on the other hand….

  7. Michael July 8, 2007 at 8:38 am

    I gotta agree with you on this one. I think that too much “body art” is just bad taste.
    Some things are OK; double piercing in the ears, subtle nose rings, small tattoos in unobtrusive places; but too many times, people just go over the top with this sort of thing.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

You may also like