911- What Lessons Were Learned

Well if you read the 911 panel report it appears that there were few if any.

WASHINGTON Dec 5, 2005 — Time, money and ever-present terror threats have done little to close gaping holes in the nation’s security system, the former Sept. 11 Commission said Monday in accusing the government of failing to protect the country against another attack.

The panel cited disjointed airplane passenger screening methods, pork-barrel security funding and other problems in saying the Bush administration and Congress had not moved quickly enough to enact the majority of its recommendations of July 2004.

“We’re frustrated, all of us frustrated at the lack of urgency in addressing these various problems,” said Thomas Kean, a Republican and former New Jersey governor who was chairman of the commission.

“We shouldn’t need another wake-up call,” Kean said. “We believe that the terrorists will strike again; so does every responsible expert that we have talked to. And if they do, and these reforms that might have prevented such an attack have not been implemented, what will our excuse be?”

Rather than disbanding like most federally appointed commissions when their terms expire, Kean and the other nine commissioners continued their work as a private entity called the 9/11 Public Discourse Project.

Wrapping up more than three years of investigations and hearings, the former commission issued what members said was their final assessment of the government’s counterterror performance as a report card. It gave failing grades in five areas, and issued only one “A” actually an A-minus for the Bush administration’s efforts to curb terrorist financing.

The five “F”s were for:

Failing to provide a radio system to allow first responders from different agencies communicate with each other during emergencies.

Distributing federal homeland security funding to states on a “pork-barrel” basis instead of risk.

Failing to consolidate names of suspicious airline travelers on a single terror watch screening list.

Hindering congressional oversight by retaining intelligence budget information as classified materials.

Failing to engage in an alliance to develop international standards for the treatment and prosecution of detained terror suspects.

The panel, which has operated as a nonprofit group since disbanding last year, also gave the government 12 “D”s and “B”s, nine “C”s and two incomplete grades.”

This is just unacceptable. It makes me very, very angry. It should be a priority that should have been handled already. What is it going to take.

(Visited 35 times, 1 visits today)


  1. Jack's Shack December 7, 2005 at 6:16 am


    It is really frightening to consider how serious this is and how poorly this has been handled.

  2. Daled Amos December 7, 2005 at 5:40 am

    What does it take? Apparently it takes a greater sense of urgency. But if 9/11 did not provide that, then we’ve got a major problem.

    We still have not caught on to the new reality.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

You may also like